Hey! Steven wanted me to take his blog for a bit (to concentrate on school I’m guessing?) so he won’t be around for awhile! He wanted me to let you guys know. Bye!!!
I JUST WATCHED THE DEATH OF THE ROBOT WITH HUMAN HAIR MUSIC VIDEO AND AAHHHHHH HOLY SHIT
Stalactite supervisor John Sato examines new formations with disappointment.
"A proper stalactite grows downward," said Sato, "But these younger stalactites are rebellious and have little respect for tradition. We’ve caught them growing sideways, diagonally, I saw one just yesterday that grew down at first but then went straight back up again into the rock ceiling."
Numerous theories abound as to why the stalactites are growing more bold. Some blame global warming for chemical shifts in the dripping minerals. Others feel television is to blame. But Sato has another theory:
"Many stalactites today come from modern rock. Classic rock held superior morals and produced straight stalactites. But modern rock, such as hard rock or acidic rock aren’t so solid. To keep stalactites on course, we must examine both the rocks and the role played by the minerals, the substance they communicate downward. Only with a comprehensive study of rock and role will we come to an understanding of the problem, and begin to move toward a solution. Such as an opaline silica solution, or a 50% fluorite solution."
Others feel that blaming rock is a cop-out, and that the problem lies with society’s standard of binary geological roles. Said Peter Saenz of GLAAD (Geological Land Appraisal And Diagnostics), “Who are we to say a stalactite has to be straight and hook up with a stalagmite? Maybe some stalactites are meant to meet other stalactites, maybe some stalactites want to find their own way through the caves. It’s not for us to dictate.”
This viewpoint has proven controversial, with high ranking clergy at the Vatican stating, “The Bible clearly states that speleothems are between one stalactite and one stalagmite, and that it is the stalactite’s role to descend upon the other.”
Peter Saenz retorts that the Vatican needs to mind its own business about what others go down on.
why do people make shit arguments against queer representation by saying things like “the percentage of lgbt people in the population isn’t that high” well neither is the percentage of vampires but we see plenty of them in our media dont we
First and foremost, water does not always put out fire. In the case of an electric fire or oil fire, please do not try and use water. The former because you want to avoid getting a shock (getting burned and electrocuted is probably best left to cartoon characters). The latter because water is usually more dense than oil and will sink and boil under the oil. The produced steam expands and causes an explosion leading to even more carnage.
Now that the safety hazards are out of the way, back to your question. Water has two main effects in putting out a fire: it removes heat from the system and it also separates the fuel and oxygen to prevent combustion. The fire triangle is a nice way to see what a fire needs to keep burning.
For a small object that can be submerged into water or fully drenched, pouring water on it essentially separates it from oxygen and immediately stops combustion. For a larger object, heat is transferred from the burning object into the water. Water has a relatively high specific heat capacity, which means it takes a fair bit of energy to cause its temperature to rise and become steam. Without sufficient heat, the fuel/object will stop burning and you will have saved the day!
Oh—you wouldn’t date a girl who’s ever been a stripper?
In that case, I wouldn’t date a guy who’s ever been to a strip club.
Oh—you wouldn’t date a girl who’s ever done porn?
In that case, I wouldn’t date a guy who’s ever watched porn.
You’re the reason we exist.
You’re the demand to our supply.
If you disdain sex workers, don’t you dare consume our labor.
As they say in the industry, “People jack off with the left hand and point with the right.”
And the Lord saw that it was wood.
#5. A Church Tries to Save an Oak Tree, Ends Up With a Dick Building
Instead of calling the ancient wonder of nature mere collateral damage in the war for your very soul, Christian Scientists [in Dixon, IL] redid their entire building to work around the tree. The church members avoided a possible local backlash, respected the sanctity of the old tree, and at the same time created an environmentally friendly building that warms naturally in the winter without any costly heating. What’s not to love?
The Backfire: The aerial image of the Church of the Flaccid Cock went viral on the Internet after it was discovered by a local resident.
a grandmother, a mother, and a daughter walk into a bar. she orders one drink
oh I get it the joke here is that they’re all the same person. she has multiple relationships to members of her family. thanks for this great post officialunitedstates
no problem I’m glad you liked it
this was written in 1322
i can’t imagine how hard it must have been struggling with gender shit back when physical transition was a total impossibility, even theoretically
i’m trying hard not to cry
we have a history. we have existed in every culture of the world at every moment of human history. cis institutions have tried to suppress this history or claim it as their own but it is not theirs. it is ours, and always will be. we must uncover and reclaim more of our history, and we must make more ourselves